ICD specific parts?

General help and support for your Lindeman through 2010 John Deere crawler
jackhdn
420 crawler
420 crawler
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 6:02 pm
Location: Buckland Massachussets

ICD specific parts?

Post by jackhdn » Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:01 am

The gas engine on my 440 is due for a rebuild. Compression is not too bad but the rear cylinder is about 15 psi lower than the front. Burns a lot of oil. Bigger problem is a rod knock on cold start.

So I've been considering my options. Of course I can rebuild the gas motor. Having the diesel could be fun though. I know where I might get a 2-53 from a 440 very reasonable. Bell housing to radiator. Started missing. Question is do the diesels have many other special parts? Hood? Throttle shaft I know.

Thoughts? The Detroit likely needs a rebuild as well. I'll never run it enough to care about the noise with the diesel and like the thought of a machine where the gas will not go bad when sitting.

Thanks.
Jack

User avatar
Lavoy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10948
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: North Dakota
Contact:

Post by Lavoy » Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:46 pm

Unless you have a later gas 440, the trans will not stand up to the diesel.
I am in the middle of a Detroit rebuild right now, and I can tell you that after this one, I will never do another one. I could have rebuilt 6 gas engine in just the time it has taken me to find parts and people with any idea of what one even is. Rebuild your gas, if you want a diesel, buy a diesel.
Lavoy
Parts and restoration for antique and late model John Deere crawlers.
Owner and moderator www.jdcrawlers.com

mini kahuna
1010 crawler
1010 crawler
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 1:08 pm
Location: rhode island

Post by mini kahuna » Tue Feb 02, 2016 6:18 pm

I would stick with the gas engine, that is a nice engine and much easier to deal with than a Detroit.
I would guess your noise is piston slap on cold startup, rod knocks don't go away when warmed up.
I always liked the gas models better, not a fan of the 2-53.
1010 loader

User avatar
jtrichard
350 crawler
350 crawler
Posts: 1883
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:48 pm
Location: Joshua Tree CA

Post by jtrichard » Tue Feb 02, 2016 7:24 pm

Loose rod bearings do knock for a short time until oil pressure is built up. piston slap will continue until she warms up ..... A lose bottom end will also flood more oil into the cylinders and with worn oil rings it will use that much more oil
2010 with 622 dozer with mod. 35 ripper and a 2010 with 622 dozer bought in 1969 and a 2010 loader with drott and mod. 36 ripper

User avatar
Stan Disbrow
350 crawler
350 crawler
Posts: 2898
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:13 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post by Stan Disbrow » Tue Feb 02, 2016 7:56 pm

Hi,

I, too, would stick with the gas engine and skip the 2-53 diesel. And, when looking at another crawler with a diesel, I would still skip over the 2-53.

Stan
There's No Such Thing As A Cheap Crawler!

Useta Have: '58 JD 420c 5-roller w/62 inside blade
Useta Have: '78 JD350C w/6310 outside blade
Useta Have: '68 JD350, '51 Terratrac GT-25
Have: 1950 M, 2005 x495, 2008 5103 (now known as 5045D)

jackhdn
420 crawler
420 crawler
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 6:02 pm
Location: Buckland Massachussets

Post by jackhdn » Tue Feb 02, 2016 8:01 pm

It is a late 440. Has the large 5 speed transmission and later 1010 style final drives. The knock does go away as soon as the oil pressure comes up. They sure are easy starting engines.

I owned a work boat for years with a 6-71. Always loved how simple the engine was. It did leak its share of oil though. Running a 2-53 in the dozer would mostly be for nostalgia and just doing something different.

Thanks.

Jack

JWB Contracting
2010 crawler
2010 crawler
Posts: 597
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:08 pm
Location: Edmonton, Alberta

253 vs 2 cylinder gas

Post by JWB Contracting » Tue Feb 02, 2016 9:42 pm

I really enjoy my ICD, but only use it occasionally for blading the yard. It does take a shot of either to start but runs great, very little smoke. It might just be the 2 cycle roar, but I think power wise it will out perform a 1010 or older 350 diesel.

The 2 cylinder gas engines are very easy to work on with few moving parts. I assembled my first one by myself a few weeks ago (420 bored 40 over) and runs great now. Waiting on a few parts to complete it, but at least it's running and moving now.

If I were you I would fix your gas engine and keep on the lookout for an ICD.
Jason Benesch

John Deere 420, 430, 440 & 350C With 3 Point Hitch
John Deere 400G With Winch
John Deere 2010 Crawler Dozer
John Deere 420, 430, 435 & 440 Wheel Tractors

User avatar
jtrichard
350 crawler
350 crawler
Posts: 1883
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:48 pm
Location: Joshua Tree CA

Post by jtrichard » Tue Feb 02, 2016 9:59 pm

YES Jason it is in all reality a bigger engine than a 1010 ,1010 is 144.5 CI and 2-53 is equivalent of 212 CI ,
2010 with 622 dozer with mod. 35 ripper and a 2010 with 622 dozer bought in 1969 and a 2010 loader with drott and mod. 36 ripper

User avatar
Lavoy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10948
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: North Dakota
Contact:

Post by Lavoy » Wed Feb 03, 2016 10:22 am

No, 2 X 53=106C.I., you are thinking 4-53.
Yes you can convert it to diesel, you will basically need a diesel crawler to part out to do it. SO, my theory is just buy a diesel crawler if that is what you want.
I can do a complete top to bottom rebuild, not overhaul on a gasser for about $1500, maybe including new engine clutch. The quotes I am getting on rebuild a blower on a 2-53 a ranging from $1000-$1500, and the parts for the engine not including injectors, and tubes at already past $1000. None of this is relevant if cost does not factor into your decision, but wanted to throw it out there.
Lavoy
Parts and restoration for antique and late model John Deere crawlers.
Owner and moderator www.jdcrawlers.com

User avatar
jtrichard
350 crawler
350 crawler
Posts: 1883
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:48 pm
Location: Joshua Tree CA

Post by jtrichard » Wed Feb 03, 2016 11:21 am

YES a 2-53 IS 106 CI but as i said A "2-53 is equivalent of 212 CI" since its a two stroke...... fires twice as often as the 1010 at 144.5 CI .....the 1010 probably has better low end torque then the 2-53 as the 2 stroke has to be kept wound up tight to maintain its torque and HP
2010 with 622 dozer with mod. 35 ripper and a 2010 with 622 dozer bought in 1969 and a 2010 loader with drott and mod. 36 ripper

User avatar
Stan Disbrow
350 crawler
350 crawler
Posts: 2898
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:13 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post by Stan Disbrow » Wed Feb 03, 2016 2:07 pm

Hi,

Ummm. My engineer brain is saying that the stroke of a 2-cycle is effectively shorter than for a 4-cycle when figuring MEPs....so, would not that be on the order of 66-75 percent the power of a 4-cylinder, 4-cycle?

In other words more on the order of 160-170 CID equivalent, not 212.....

Yeah. I know. Nitpicking engineers! :P

Anyway, a lot more chops than the 2-cylinder gas engine, hence the beefing up of everything behind the 2-53 on the 440 series.

Still, for me, I would jump right to a JD350. Oh. Wait. I did! Still wish I had that 350 still vs. Dad's 420.....on the other hand, it is nice to have his old favorite still.

Stan
There's No Such Thing As A Cheap Crawler!

Useta Have: '58 JD 420c 5-roller w/62 inside blade
Useta Have: '78 JD350C w/6310 outside blade
Useta Have: '68 JD350, '51 Terratrac GT-25
Have: 1950 M, 2005 x495, 2008 5103 (now known as 5045D)

User avatar
Lavoy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10948
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: North Dakota
Contact:

Post by Lavoy » Wed Feb 03, 2016 3:00 pm

Yeah missed that, I see what you mean. The Detroit is about 100ft. lbs torque at 1200 give or take. We have a 1010 gas, and it seems to me to be about 10ft lbs at full throttle! :lol:
Also keep in mind that this is pretty much the lowest HP rating I think the 2-53 ever had, and lowest RPM. I think Detroit specs lowest rating as 36HP at 2600RPM. Seems to me the top rating is in the 60HP + range. Pretty impressive for a little tiny 2 banger.
If you are really bored, look up the 20V-149TI some time. 2980C.I. and about 3,000 HP!
Lavoy
Parts and restoration for antique and late model John Deere crawlers.
Owner and moderator www.jdcrawlers.com

User avatar
Stan Disbrow
350 crawler
350 crawler
Posts: 2898
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:13 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post by Stan Disbrow » Wed Feb 03, 2016 7:27 pm

Hi,

Well...I know the 16-278 units used in WWII submarines. Those were pretty impressive. Four per sub whirling generators to electric motors. Pushed a 300 foot long, 1600 ton sub at 20 knots on the surface. :)

I ran a 435 with a 1000 RPM 3-string baler many an hour when a teenager. They did the job, but noisy as hell. Might be why I don't want one in a crawler! :P

Stan
There's No Such Thing As A Cheap Crawler!

Useta Have: '58 JD 420c 5-roller w/62 inside blade
Useta Have: '78 JD350C w/6310 outside blade
Useta Have: '68 JD350, '51 Terratrac GT-25
Have: 1950 M, 2005 x495, 2008 5103 (now known as 5045D)

jackhdn
420 crawler
420 crawler
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 6:02 pm
Location: Buckland Massachussets

Post by jackhdn » Thu Feb 04, 2016 10:04 am

I agree a 350 with a power six-way would be ideal. They start around 5k and regularly bring over 10k here. Not as easy to work on as the little 440. Certainly a more capable machine.

I know exactly what I have with my 440. Since it needs an overhaul anyway I was considering the Detroit. Noisy yes---but simple engines to work on. Lots of them in work boats on the coast. I once knew a boat with 5 natural aspirated 6-71s driving through a common gearbox. 5 Detroits in a closed steel room----that was noisy.

Thanks for all the thoughts.

Jack

User avatar
pop pop
1010 crawler
1010 crawler
Posts: 490
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:07 am
Location: chandler, arizona

Post by pop pop » Thu Feb 04, 2016 12:12 pm

put a good muffler on that Detroit and they even sound better.
you will probably have a good chance of finding one out of a boat since you are located in boat country.
to say the least you should be able to find plenty of parts.
2/53's have 65 hp capability but not recomended.
440icd/602/8a,,440icd/831/ripper,,440icd/831/3pt.,misc. 440 parts, i have 5 of these now, but i can stop anytime :cry:

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 162 guests