# 76 blade

General help and support for your Lindeman through 2010 John Deere crawler
Post Reply
BLS
430 crawler
430 crawler
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 12:16 pm
Location: Center of the Universe

# 76 blade

Post by BLS » Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:19 pm

Will a # 76 blade fit on a 430C? of so, what else does it fit.

Thanks

Brian

User avatar
Lavoy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10948
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: North Dakota
Contact:

Post by Lavoy » Sat Oct 21, 2006 9:46 am

If it has been modified, it will fit 40-430, it was designed to fit the 1010 ag, but would fit 1010 industrial and 440.
Lavoy

mikes420c
40C crawler
40C crawler
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Jesup Georgia

Post by mikes420c » Sat Oct 21, 2006 5:07 pm

How much modification would it take to mount what looks like a #63 on a 420? I think that is what is on a 1010 in a local parts yard. I already have the blade itself but need mounting arms, cylinders, etc,.

User avatar
Lavoy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10948
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: North Dakota
Contact:

Post by Lavoy » Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:18 pm

#63 came on the 440, I can't remember what it is called on a 1010.
The mounting brackets are designed for a round front crossbar on front, and bolt to a heavy casting on the rear, neither of which is on a 420. It could be done, but will take a fair amount of torch and welder work.
Lavoy

BLS
430 crawler
430 crawler
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 12:16 pm
Location: Center of the Universe

Post by BLS » Mon Oct 23, 2006 8:55 am

Lavoy,

Can you list the Deere blades that came with each modle from MC thru 440, and a general discription. It would be great to know what was available.

Thanks.


Brian

User avatar
Lavoy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10948
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: North Dakota
Contact:

Post by Lavoy » Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:01 am

MC could have been MC1000 tool carrier, and MC60. #61 will fit, but way too front heavy.
40 was #'s 1000, & 1100 tool carrier, MC60, #61, #62 will fit, as well as 602, but real heavy for a 40.
420 and 430 were #61, #62, and 602
440 was #63, #64, and 602
Lavoy

BLS
430 crawler
430 crawler
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 12:16 pm
Location: Center of the Universe

Post by BLS » Mon Oct 23, 2006 11:12 am

Lavoy,

Thanks for the information.

Is this correct then...

MC60 is an inside arm with one hydraulic cylinder.
The # 61 was an inside arm single cylinder (4 way blade).
The # 62 was an inside arm dual cylinders (6 way blade).

Visually, how can I tell the 602 blade from the # 61 and # 62?

Also, what was the P/N of the blade that attaches to the MC1000 tool carrier.

Thanks.

Brian

User avatar
Lavoy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10948
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: North Dakota
Contact:

Post by Lavoy » Mon Oct 23, 2006 1:51 pm

The 602 is an outside arm angle dozer, completely different from 61 & 62.
The dozer blade is an MC100 Bulldozer attachment.
Lavoy

User avatar
JD40c
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 221
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:14 pm
Location: Athena, OR
Contact:

Post by JD40c » Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:29 pm

I have a #76 on my 40C (four roller undercarriage) and notice the weight a fair bit when I lift the blade.
1955 John Deere 40C 4-roller

User avatar
Stan Disbrow
350 crawler
350 crawler
Posts: 2898
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:13 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post by Stan Disbrow » Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:05 pm

Hi,

Just thought I'd point out that the model 64 blade for the 440 was a power angle tilt blade. Pretty sweet if you happen to have one....

Stan
There's No Such Thing As A Cheap Crawler!

Useta Have: '58 JD 420c 5-roller w/62 inside blade
Useta Have: '78 JD350C w/6310 outside blade
Useta Have: '68 JD350, '51 Terratrac GT-25
Have: 1950 M, 2005 x495, 2008 5103 (now known as 5045D)

User avatar
Lavoy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10948
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: North Dakota
Contact:

Post by Lavoy » Tue Nov 28, 2006 4:49 pm

I have a #64, it is in pieces to be restored, kind of like the crawler it came on, but hopefully in the next 20-30 years I get it done.
lavoy

ggfossen
440 crawler
440 crawler
Posts: 216
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 8:08 pm
Location: Jacksonville, Oregon

Post by ggfossen » Tue Nov 28, 2006 5:49 pm

Mine is a Holt blade with outside arms, manual angle, and manual rotate. Would it be much like the 602?

I know that it was on the crawler from only a few years after manufacture, so it probably was built for the 420? Serial numbers are still visible. I think they are different for the blade vs the mount.

Gary.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 156 guests