Question about JD 440 ICD Sprockets

General help and support for your Lindeman through 2010 John Deere crawler
Post Reply
User avatar
thomastractorsvc
420 crawler
420 crawler
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:07 pm
Location: Kansas City Area, Missouri
Contact:

Question about JD 440 ICD Sprockets

Post by thomastractorsvc » Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:04 pm

Does any one one know the difference between the T16261T and the T16259T Sprockets are other than one is from an older machine. Mine has the T16259T but those sprockets are like hens teeth. I spent most of the day finding out no JD Dealers in the USA have them listed as NOS or any of the old parts wholesalers, but they could find dozens of the T16261T.

Thanks
Rob
JD 990 w/300CX FEL & JD 8A Backhoe
I reject your reality and substitute my own! Adam Savage of MythBusters

User avatar
wwattson
1010 crawler
1010 crawler
Posts: 499
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:12 pm
Location: West Bend, WI

Post by wwattson » Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:13 am

If you do a search on this board, you'll find that the T16259 sprocket situation is pretty much your experience and there aren't any to find. Here's a post that describes overall what many of the undercarriage differences are across the Deere line. When Lavoy checks in, he can tell you the specific difference between the T16259 and T16261 but I believe it's the depth of the sprocket dish and hole pattern.

There's always 350 weld on rims.

http://www.jdcrawlers.com/messageboard/ ... php?t=1032
Bill Wattson

User avatar
Lavoy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10948
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: North Dakota
Contact:

Post by Lavoy » Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:41 pm

The offset is 1" narrower on the T16259, and the two do not interchange, at least not on a 440.
Lavoy

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 179 guests