Hardfacing wire for Roller Build-up
Hardfacing wire for Roller Build-up
I know this topic has come up before but I don't know that we talked about any particular product. I'm looking at using the VertiWear AP hardfacing MIG wire for doing roller build-ups. This wire goes down relatively soft (on the order of Rc 8 for three passes) but quickly work hardens to the Rc 50-55 range. Seems like it would be a pretty decent solution to doing roller build-ups but I have no experience with these alloys. Any of you guys that are welders got any experience with these?
Bill Wattson
My fear would be that it would end up being too hard. I don't know the number, but I think Stoody had a build up wire, called a work hardening wire. It went on soft, then work hardens just like the wire you are referring to, but my assumption is not as hard. If you can find any specs on this wire, it might give you an idea as to finish hardness once it has work hardened.
Lavoy
Lavoy
Thanks for the replies guys. Lavoy, the numbers I posted are off the data sheet for the VertiWear AP wire. Berco lists the hardness of their current production rollers as RC 56 for shell surface and RC 40 at the core. Sprockets are similar showing RC 54 surface and RC 40 core. It seems like the hardness is about right assuming that the older crawler parts used similar values but you'd know better than I.
I'll do some digging on the Stoody wire and see what I learn. I appreciate the feedback as I've used none of these products and don't know what works.
I'll do some digging on the Stoody wire and see what I learn. I appreciate the feedback as I've used none of these products and don't know what works.
Bill Wattson
Stoody sure has a bunch of different alloys for these applications. It seems from their selection guide that the mainstay is the Stoody 105 wiring or Stoody 1105 electrode. Neither is work hardening and the hardness is in the RC 40 - 45 range as deposited. Most of their work hardening wires are in the same range as the Vertiwear with some going as high as RC 60.
I'll have to see if I can find a similar selection guide on the McKay/Hobart site to see what they say. Now you know why I asked. So many choices but so few roller shells. Lucky for me I've got two extra in case I screw up.
I'll have to see if I can find a similar selection guide on the McKay/Hobart site to see what they say. Now you know why I asked. So many choices but so few roller shells. Lucky for me I've got two extra in case I screw up.
Bill Wattson
I was thinking that about the rails myself Lavoy. I know the new rail links are in the same range as the roller shells but I don't know what the old links were hardened to. It seems from the stuff I've read that the really hard hardfacing alloys are reserved for cutting edges and teeth and that the roller alloys seem to be more in the RC 40 - 45 range and non-work hardening. I'm sure this has a lot to do with getting better hardness control for the application and making sure that if something has to wear, it's the roller rather than the rail links.
The added benefit is that the recommended alloys can be machined with carbide tools so you overbuild to a degree and then turn to smooth final dimensions. Now all I need is a better MIG welder and that turntable you and I talked about last year.
The added benefit is that the recommended alloys can be machined with carbide tools so you overbuild to a degree and then turn to smooth final dimensions. Now all I need is a better MIG welder and that turntable you and I talked about last year.
Bill Wattson
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests