For Sale: 2-#62 dozer blades, one original, one restored. The restored one came off of my 420, was used after restoration, so paint is scratched up, but has very few hours on it.
Call or e-mail any questions.
Lavoy
2-#62 dozer blades for sale
-
Stan Disbrow
- 350 crawler
- Posts: 2898
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:13 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC
Hi,
I'd think a 62 would be too heavy for a 3-roller track. The machine would ride on the front idlers more than the bottom rollers even if you managed to get one mounted. The 62 was meant for the 5-roller 420. The blade for the MC was a lot lighter.
Stan
I'd think a 62 would be too heavy for a 3-roller track. The machine would ride on the front idlers more than the bottom rollers even if you managed to get one mounted. The 62 was meant for the 5-roller 420. The blade for the MC was a lot lighter.
Stan
There's No Such Thing As A Cheap Crawler!
Useta Have: '58 JD 420c 5-roller w/62 inside blade
Useta Have: '78 JD350C w/6310 outside blade
Useta Have: '68 JD350, '51 Terratrac GT-25
Have: 1950 M, 2005 x495, 2008 5103 (now known as 5045D)
Useta Have: '58 JD 420c 5-roller w/62 inside blade
Useta Have: '78 JD350C w/6310 outside blade
Useta Have: '68 JD350, '51 Terratrac GT-25
Have: 1950 M, 2005 x495, 2008 5103 (now known as 5045D)
The restored blade is sold, sorry I didn't post sooner.
No, an MC will not carry a 62 blade. Even when mounted on a 4 roller crawler, the owners manual will caution you to not carry the blade all the way in the air. Even a 61 blade is really too heavy for an MC, it will spend all day riding on its nose.
Lavoy
No, an MC will not carry a 62 blade. Even when mounted on a 4 roller crawler, the owners manual will caution you to not carry the blade all the way in the air. Even a 61 blade is really too heavy for an MC, it will spend all day riding on its nose.
Lavoy
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 114 guests