Show us pictures of your JD crawler and attachments.
-
tirzahtoo
- MC crawler
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:47 pm
Post
by tirzahtoo » Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:57 pm
after engine and clutch rebuild
-
ohmgman
- 40C crawler
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 7:56 am
Post
by ohmgman » Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:14 pm
Sweet.
-
Davie Sprocket
- 430 crawler
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 11:37 am
- Location: Leduc Alberta, Canada
Post
by Davie Sprocket » Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:50 pm
Very nice.
420C Holt Blade ROPS
420-40C Basket Case
-
mini kahuna
- 1010 crawler
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 1:08 pm
- Location: rhode island
Post
by mini kahuna » Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:45 pm
you guys amaze me with the skill and effort you put into these deeres.
that is a sharp looking machine.
1010 loader
-
JD440ICD2006
- 350 crawler
- Posts: 1113
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:57 pm
- Location: South Carolina
Post
by JD440ICD2006 » Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:49 pm
Seriously about the straightest MC I have seen. I know you are very proud of that machine!
1959 JD 440ICD w/64 Power Angle Tilt Blade
1959 JD 440ICD w/63 Manual Angle Blade
1959 JD 440IC w/602 Manual Angle Blade
1959 JD 730D W SE (many options)
1950 JD M S w/M-20 Mower
1952 JD M W
1955 FORD 640 (burns the most fuel)
-
FarmLife
- 430 crawler
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:55 pm
- Location: Saint Clair, Michigan
-
Contact:
Post
by FarmLife » Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:04 pm
Looks great, hope to have ours looking that good someday
1934 GP Beaner
1935 B
1935 AR
1935 AO
1936 B
1936 D
1935 A on skeletons
1937 A w/behlen overdrive
1939 B
1940 B
1941 H
1949 M
1954 40 Standard
1953 60 Regular
1955 70 Std Diesel
1954 80
1946 Lindeman
Phase 1 420
-
Ray III
- 2010 crawler
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 1:39 pm
- Location: Troy, NY
Post
by Ray III » Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:48 pm
Very nice. Did the MCs have a different track frame from the 40s?
-
Lavoy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10949
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:32 pm
- Location: North Dakota
-
Contact:
Post
by Lavoy » Sat Feb 09, 2008 10:16 am
The early 40, under serial number 62,263 uses the same track frame as an MC, after that, completely different setup.
Lavoy
-
Ray
- 440 crawler
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 11:04 am
- Location: Madison, Indiana
Post
by Ray » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:23 pm
You did a nice job on this MC.
What year is it?
Do you know how long JD used this style track pads on the MC? .. Ray
-
tirzahtoo
- MC crawler
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:47 pm
Post
by tirzahtoo » Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:07 pm
its a 1951
-
Lavoy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10949
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:32 pm
- Location: North Dakota
-
Contact:
Post
by Lavoy » Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:15 pm
That style pad was used on all MC's, only difference is the late pads are thicker and use a cap screw instead of a carriage bolt.
Lavoy
-
Ray
- 440 crawler
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 11:04 am
- Location: Madison, Indiana
Post
by Ray » Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:49 pm
Lavoy wrote:That style pad was used on all MC's, only difference is the late pads are thicker and use a cap screw instead of a carriage bolt.
Lavoy
Thanks Lavoy
I'm still green ( no pun intended ) when it comes to other crawlers.
There have been a few MC's at the shows. A couple of them have had the grouser style pads, so I figured JD switched at some time.
-
Lavoy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10949
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:32 pm
- Location: North Dakota
-
Contact:
Post
by Lavoy » Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:05 pm
I think that in later years, the flat pads were probably cheaper than the stamped pads, or they got a used set. The other advantage of the later pads is the tracks can be rebushed without removing the pads.
Lavoy
-
Ray
- 440 crawler
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 11:04 am
- Location: Madison, Indiana
Post
by Ray » Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:16 am
More questions.
Did all of the MC's come with the rear power take-off, or was that an option?
Ive saw one with a 3-point hitch. Was that an option or did someone fit it with a 3-point off a tractor? .. Ray
-
tirzahtoo
- MC crawler
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:47 pm
Post
by tirzahtoo » Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:06 pm
i believe all mcs had the pto but i dont think a 3 point was an option-----my books dont show anything about that-----Lavoy is the expert and i would refer to him.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 82 guests