450 JD track loader manual versu HLR transmission
450 JD track loader manual versu HLR transmission
I am looking at buying a 450 JD track loader and would rather not buy any thing that a has a hydrostatic transmission been there done that with a international loader and that was a big mistake is the HLR tranny hydrostatic or is it some type of gear driven set up ? is the manaul more rugged or reliable than the HLR ?
The transmission is gear driven however the reverser engages to drive the crawler. Both Transmission and reverser are in the same case on a 450, with the power first going through the reverser then the gear selection. the reverser operates with clutches that engage using hydraulic pressure and have multiple wet discs for reverse as well as forward. I have never had a problem with one ....yet anyway.
Scott
Scott
450`s c-dozer 6 way, b-loader.
350`s c-loader + ripper, b-loader with winch arch. B-loader with dozer pads
backhoe attachment.
1010 loader with forks for round bales
a few 610 Bobcats. many attachments
350`s c-loader + ripper, b-loader with winch arch. B-loader with dozer pads
backhoe attachment.
1010 loader with forks for round bales
a few 610 Bobcats. many attachments
If you go to the JD parts catalog online (it's free) you can see the major differences in parts between the constant mesh transmission ("manual") and the HLR transmission. The parts catalog specifically lists what parts are shared and which are different.
The bigger factor in your decision may be availability. I don't know the percentage of straight 450s produced that had constant mesh versus HLR, but I would imagine that ratio is pretty low- you might have a hard time finding one with a constant mesh transmission. Every straight 450 I have seen in person has the HLR, but that doesn't mean straight 450s with the constant mesh transmission aren't out there either.
The bigger factor in your decision may be availability. I don't know the percentage of straight 450s produced that had constant mesh versus HLR, but I would imagine that ratio is pretty low- you might have a hard time finding one with a constant mesh transmission. Every straight 450 I have seen in person has the HLR, but that doesn't mean straight 450s with the constant mesh transmission aren't out there either.
(1) JD Straight 450 crawler dozer with manual outside blade; (2) JD 2010 diesel crawler loaders; (1) JD 2010 diesel dozer with hydraulic 6-way blade; (2) Model 50 backhoe attachments, misc. other construction equipment
Tiger if the 450s are like the 2010s in the loader version they only came in HLR.... not available in consent mesh with loader Perchron the HLR is a hydraulic clutch applied trans (there is a pump on the main input shaft in the trans) it runs just like a consent mesh if you go in to something and it bogs down it will either spin the tracks or kill the engine ..it has NO torque converter.... whats nice with the HLR is no clutch shifting from forward to reverse and from HIGH to LOW and vise-versa
2010 with 622 dozer with mod. 35 ripper and a 2010 with 622 dozer bought in 1969 and a 2010 loader with drott and mod. 36 ripper
You should also read what discussion threads you can on here about the HLR- they are pretty rugged but once they are worn out they are very pricey to repair. Many of the commercial users/former JD mechanics on here have mentioned that when they are really worn they seem OK when cold but start to slip when hot. You have to be careful when shopping for a crawler with HLR to try and test it out long enough to get it up to operating temperature and see if it slips.
(1) JD Straight 450 crawler dozer with manual outside blade; (2) JD 2010 diesel crawler loaders; (1) JD 2010 diesel dozer with hydraulic 6-way blade; (2) Model 50 backhoe attachments, misc. other construction equipment
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 166 guests