Experiential MC
- mapaduke@yahoo.com
- 1010 crawler
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:27 pm
- Location: Rochester N.H.
Experiential MC
http://rs877.pbsrc.com/albums/ab331/MAP ... 0&fit=clip
http://rs877.pbsrc.com/albums/ab331/MAP ... 0&fit=clip
I'm experimenting with a rock shaft from a M on a MC that I'm rebuilding.I have all the clearances I need after taking the heat wrench to the right steering leaver, even the belt pully clears.I will be fabericating a bracket for the top link and attach it to the top of the rock shaft were the seat mounts.
Looking for input, any thoughts?
http://rs877.pbsrc.com/albums/ab331/MAP ... 0&fit=clip
I'm experimenting with a rock shaft from a M on a MC that I'm rebuilding.I have all the clearances I need after taking the heat wrench to the right steering leaver, even the belt pully clears.I will be fabericating a bracket for the top link and attach it to the top of the rock shaft were the seat mounts.
Looking for input, any thoughts?
nothing crawles like a deere
Couple thoughts. Rockshaft housing on an M is reservoir, valve, and bypass all rolled into one. Are you going to delete the crawler valve and reservoir and hook everything up to the M rockshaft housing? If not, how are you going to bypass the internal valving and such to operate with the crawler hyd?
Seat mounting bolts are to hold your butt, my guess is it will be a spectacular bang when it lets go, and I personally would be uncomfortable with that happening under my rear end.
Unless you meant mounting under the housing to the 4 larger bolts in the top of the tranny case.
Lavoy
Seat mounting bolts are to hold your butt, my guess is it will be a spectacular bang when it lets go, and I personally would be uncomfortable with that happening under my rear end.

Lavoy
Parts and restoration for antique and late model John Deere crawlers.
Owner and moderator www.jdcrawlers.com
Owner and moderator www.jdcrawlers.com
- mapaduke@yahoo.com
- 1010 crawler
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:27 pm
- Location: Rochester N.H.
- mapaduke@yahoo.com
- 1010 crawler
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:27 pm
- Location: Rochester N.H.
I've used it for digging post holes, mowing (brush hog type), grader blade. Mine does not have any provision for float, which I should have put in too. I've lifted the back of the crawler off the ground a couple times mowing some ditches and not lifting the mower high enough. I've modified the top link on the mower to allow some float and that helped.
- mapaduke@yahoo.com
- 1010 crawler
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:27 pm
- Location: Rochester N.H.
- Stan Disbrow
- 350 crawler
- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:13 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC
Hi,
So, just going to lift light 3pt stuff, then. The single piston M rockshaft can't lift much. Mine won't lift my 6' brushhog, at 950 pounds but will a 6' finishing mower at 550 pounds. And, even the bigger dual pistons ones don't do what I would really want a crawler 3pt to do - push down as well as lift.
Plus, even a 3 roller crawler can yank on something so hard, I would fear that casting would be a real risk for being pulled apart should something get stuck back there....and I do not wanna be sitting atop that if it happened.
I use a drawbar pulled Hog behind my 420c. But, one day, maybe I will add a 3pt to it.
Stan
Edit: Oh, and the top link on my M 3pt conversion goes where the belt pulley used to be.
Edit2: added mower weights.
So, just going to lift light 3pt stuff, then. The single piston M rockshaft can't lift much. Mine won't lift my 6' brushhog, at 950 pounds but will a 6' finishing mower at 550 pounds. And, even the bigger dual pistons ones don't do what I would really want a crawler 3pt to do - push down as well as lift.
Plus, even a 3 roller crawler can yank on something so hard, I would fear that casting would be a real risk for being pulled apart should something get stuck back there....and I do not wanna be sitting atop that if it happened.
I use a drawbar pulled Hog behind my 420c. But, one day, maybe I will add a 3pt to it.
Stan
Edit: Oh, and the top link on my M 3pt conversion goes where the belt pulley used to be.
Edit2: added mower weights.
Last edited by Stan Disbrow on Sat Dec 19, 2015 8:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
There's No Such Thing As A Cheap Crawler!
Useta Have: '58 JD 420c 5-roller w/62 inside blade
Useta Have: '78 JD350C w/6310 outside blade
Useta Have: '68 JD350, '51 Terratrac GT-25
Have: 1950 M, 2005 x495, 2008 5103 (5045D), 2025 3025E
Useta Have: '58 JD 420c 5-roller w/62 inside blade
Useta Have: '78 JD350C w/6310 outside blade
Useta Have: '68 JD350, '51 Terratrac GT-25
Have: 1950 M, 2005 x495, 2008 5103 (5045D), 2025 3025E
I use a 6' brush hog and I have no problem at all lifting it or powering it.mapaduke@yahoo.com wrote:I have a four foot bush hog that I would like to try hope it has enough power, I use it behind a 22 hp Kubota now.
NOTE: You MUST use an over ride coupler on the brush hog. You push the clutch in and the brush hog is still spinning... something has to give, best be the coupling !!
- mapaduke@yahoo.com
- 1010 crawler
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:27 pm
- Location: Rochester N.H.
- Paul Buhler
- 350 crawler
- Posts: 993
- Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 6:25 pm
- Location: Killington, VT
- mapaduke@yahoo.com
- 1010 crawler
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:27 pm
- Location: Rochester N.H.
- Stan Disbrow
- 350 crawler
- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:13 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC
Hi,
I edited my earlier posts with the weights of the two 6 foot mowers. The Brush Hog is 950 pounds and my M single cylinder lift unit won't quite pick it up. The finishing mower is 550 pounds and it will. I don't have anything in between those two to try and narrow it down.
There are all sorts of bush hogs out there, light, medium and heavy duty for each width, so it would be hard to say what they might weigh. However, I would think even a heavy duty 4 footer ought to weigh in light enough. That 6 foot heavy duty one I have is exactly that: heavy. It is the heaviest 3 pt Cat-I item I have.
Now, my M still sports the original QuickTach equipment with a couple welded up adapters to take the 3pt lower pins and a welded up plate over the hole where the belt pulley would go to take a top link.
So that means the implement mounts closer to the machine than standard for a Cat-I 3pt system. That causes me to use really short driveshafts once I add the overrun unit. That, coupled with the PTO shaft offset (the M series has the shaft offset from what later was normal) tends to eat U joints.
These days, all I use on the back of the M which is PTO driven is a seeder/spreader. Everything else goes on back of the 5103 which is Cat-II and independent PTO. Except the 6 foot Hog, which was modified with a drawbar to hang onto the 420c. Can't poke a tire with a sharp stump-ette if you don't have tires!
There was a time when I had a spare dual piston rockshaft from a 420w that I was going to put on my 420c, but then Lavoy talked me out of it because whatever I made up would likely be ripped to shreds as soon as I got whatever was on the back hung up and all that traction didn't even slow down much less slip.... So I opted to use the drawbar.
Stan
I edited my earlier posts with the weights of the two 6 foot mowers. The Brush Hog is 950 pounds and my M single cylinder lift unit won't quite pick it up. The finishing mower is 550 pounds and it will. I don't have anything in between those two to try and narrow it down.
There are all sorts of bush hogs out there, light, medium and heavy duty for each width, so it would be hard to say what they might weigh. However, I would think even a heavy duty 4 footer ought to weigh in light enough. That 6 foot heavy duty one I have is exactly that: heavy. It is the heaviest 3 pt Cat-I item I have.
Now, my M still sports the original QuickTach equipment with a couple welded up adapters to take the 3pt lower pins and a welded up plate over the hole where the belt pulley would go to take a top link.
So that means the implement mounts closer to the machine than standard for a Cat-I 3pt system. That causes me to use really short driveshafts once I add the overrun unit. That, coupled with the PTO shaft offset (the M series has the shaft offset from what later was normal) tends to eat U joints.
These days, all I use on the back of the M which is PTO driven is a seeder/spreader. Everything else goes on back of the 5103 which is Cat-II and independent PTO. Except the 6 foot Hog, which was modified with a drawbar to hang onto the 420c. Can't poke a tire with a sharp stump-ette if you don't have tires!

There was a time when I had a spare dual piston rockshaft from a 420w that I was going to put on my 420c, but then Lavoy talked me out of it because whatever I made up would likely be ripped to shreds as soon as I got whatever was on the back hung up and all that traction didn't even slow down much less slip.... So I opted to use the drawbar.
Stan
There's No Such Thing As A Cheap Crawler!
Useta Have: '58 JD 420c 5-roller w/62 inside blade
Useta Have: '78 JD350C w/6310 outside blade
Useta Have: '68 JD350, '51 Terratrac GT-25
Have: 1950 M, 2005 x495, 2008 5103 (5045D), 2025 3025E
Useta Have: '58 JD 420c 5-roller w/62 inside blade
Useta Have: '78 JD350C w/6310 outside blade
Useta Have: '68 JD350, '51 Terratrac GT-25
Have: 1950 M, 2005 x495, 2008 5103 (5045D), 2025 3025E
As far as lift goes, mine wil pick it up with easily, but, mine uses a 3" cyl under the seat, not the original internal cyl. I also have a new front pump running at 1000-1200 psi with after market controls. No part of the hydraulics is original equipment.
The finals should be no problem if they can support a loader and tail wts as they came with the factory loader option.
The finals should be no problem if they can support a loader and tail wts as they came with the factory loader option.
- Stan Disbrow
- 350 crawler
- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 3:13 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC
Hi,
The parts I was referring to ripping apart were the 420 tractor 3-pt parts. Not any crawler parts.
And, the thought of the tractor bit I happened to be sitting atop of ripping apart wasn't something I wish to ever experience.....
The 420 crawler 3-pt parts are very different from any of the tractor ones, including the big (for the 420 series) row-crop/utility variant.
At the time, I had redone both a 420W and a 430W and had a pile of leftover parts, including a rockshaft and 3-pt hitch.
Stan
The parts I was referring to ripping apart were the 420 tractor 3-pt parts. Not any crawler parts.

And, the thought of the tractor bit I happened to be sitting atop of ripping apart wasn't something I wish to ever experience.....
The 420 crawler 3-pt parts are very different from any of the tractor ones, including the big (for the 420 series) row-crop/utility variant.
At the time, I had redone both a 420W and a 430W and had a pile of leftover parts, including a rockshaft and 3-pt hitch.
Stan
There's No Such Thing As A Cheap Crawler!
Useta Have: '58 JD 420c 5-roller w/62 inside blade
Useta Have: '78 JD350C w/6310 outside blade
Useta Have: '68 JD350, '51 Terratrac GT-25
Have: 1950 M, 2005 x495, 2008 5103 (5045D), 2025 3025E
Useta Have: '58 JD 420c 5-roller w/62 inside blade
Useta Have: '78 JD350C w/6310 outside blade
Useta Have: '68 JD350, '51 Terratrac GT-25
Have: 1950 M, 2005 x495, 2008 5103 (5045D), 2025 3025E
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests